Technical Education Lecturers’ Knowledge of Students’ Engagement in Application of Interactive Instructional Strategies

Authors

  • Jane Itohan Oviawe Department of Vocational and Technical Education Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Edo State, NIGERIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53797/jthkkss.v1i1.1.2020

Keywords:

technical education, students’ engagement, interactive instructional strategies

Abstract

This study investigated technical education lecturers’ knowledge of students’ engagement application of interactive instructional strategies using descriptive survey research design. Four research questions and four null hypotheses guided the study. The study aimed to determine technical education lecturers’ knowledge of the: meaning and levels of students’ engagement in instruction; indicators of students’ engagement in instruction; factors that influence students’ engagement in instruction; and active learning strategies that promote students’ engagement in instruction. The population for the study consisted of all (92) technical education lecturers in both universities and colleges of education (technical) in South-South Nigeria. Since the population was not large, there was no sampling. The instrument used for data collection was a 20-item questionnaire derived from literature reviewed. Five experts validated the instrument. Cronbach Alpha method was used to determine the reliability of the instrument and a reliability coefficient of 0.83 was obtained. The research questions were answered using Mean statistic, while the null hypotheses were tested using t-test at .05 level of significance. The findings revealed that technical education lecturers were not adequately knowledgeable of the interactive instructional strategies that foster students’ engagement in instructions. Based on the findings of this study, it was recommended among others that students’ engagement in instruction should be emphasized in capacity building through mentoring and peer collaboration that offer technical teacher education programmes organized within tertiary institutions, by government and other stakeholders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blatchford, P., Bassett, P. & Brown, P. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher-pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs secondary schools. Learning and instruction 21 (1), 715-730.

Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical assessment research and evaluation 8 (13). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=13

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. (1st ed.). New York, NY: Harper Perennial Publishers.

Federal Republic of Nigeria, (2014). National Policy on Education. Lagos: NERDC Press.

Finn, J.D. & Pannozzo, G. M. (2004). Classroom organization and student behaviour in kindergarten. Journal of educational research, 98 (2), 79-92.

Fletcher, A. (2005). Meaningful student involvement: Guide to students as partners in school change. Olympia, WA: Common Action. Retrieved from http://www.soundout.org/MSIGuide.pdf

Izuagba, A.C., Afurobi, A.O. & Jeremiah, S. (2014). Theory and practice of child friendly schools in Nigeria. Owerri: Cel-Bez Publishers.

Manuel, S. (2011). How classroom management affects student engagement. Theory into practice, 48 (2), 114-121.

Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D.J. &Heflebower, T. (2011). The main idea: The highly engaged classroom. Marzano research laboratory.

Nussbasum-Beach, S. (2015). The key to making the shift to active learning (and why technology is not enough) powerful learning practice. Retrieved from http://plpnetwork.com/2015

Ogbuanya, T.C. & Onatunde, E.K. (2015). Effects of cooperative mastery learning approach (CMLA) on students’ interest towards learning technical drawing in technical colleges in Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, Nigeria. International journal of educational research, 14 (1), 40-56.

Olaitan, S.O., Asogwa, V.C. &Eze, S.O. (2011). Entrepreneurial skill capacity building needs of instructors in range and pasture management for effective teaching of animal production in schools of agriculture in Southeast, Nigeria. Journal of Nigeria educational research association 16(1), 105-114.

Oliveira dos Santos, W., Gomes, T., & Silva, C. (2017). Towards a flow state identification in educational games: An empirical study. Brazilian symposium on computes in education. Proceedings of SBIE.

Oludipe, B.I. & Oludipe, I.D. (2010). Effect of constructivist-based teaching strategy on academic performance of students’ in integrated science at the junior secondary school level. Educational research and reviews, 5 (7), 347 - 353. Retrieved from http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/ERR/article-full-text-pdf/34B74D84098

Oranu, P.C. (2011). Student engagement: Issues and concerns for Nigerian schools in achieving millennium development goals. International journal of academic research in progressive education and development, 1 (1), 256- 259. Retrieved from http://www.hrmars.com/admin/pics/629.pdf

Oviawe, J.I. (2019). Professional Teaching Competencies Required by Lecturers for effective implementation of Technical Drawing Curriculum in Tertiary Institutions in South-South Nigeria. Journal of Educational Realities (JERA), 8(1), 12-29.

Oviawe, J.I., Ezeji, S.C.O.A., &Uwameiye, R. (2015). Comparative effectiveness of three methods on the academic performance of students in building technology in Nigerian polytechnics. European Scientific Journal 11 (12), 274– 285.

Oviawe, J.I., Ezeji, S.C.O.A., &Uwameiye, R. (2016). Effects of cooperative learning on building technology students’ acquisition of workplace skills. Indian Journal of Vocational Education 20 &21 (1), 77-88.

Pollack, S. (2015). Moving beyond icebreakers: An innovative approach to group facilitation, learning and action. Retrieved from www.movingbeyondicebreakers.org/chapters/interactive-methods-in-the-classroom.php

Shernoff, D,J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B. &Shernoff, E. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School psychology quarterly, 18 (2), 158-176.

Skinner, E.A. & Belmont, M.J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behaviour and student engagement across the school year. Journal of educational psychology, 85 (4), 571-581. Retrieved from http://www.ericdigests.org/2005-2/engagement.html

Taylor, L. & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current issues in education, 14 (1). Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/

Willams, J.D. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved from http://www.unb.ca/crisp/pdf/0306.pdf

World Bank (2003). Tertiary education (Higher Education). Washington DC: The World Bank.

Young, S. & Bruce, M.A. (2011). Classroom community and student engagement in online courses. MERLOT journal of online learning and teaching, 7 (2), 219-230.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-24

How to Cite

Oviawe, J. I. (2020). Technical Education Lecturers’ Knowledge of Students’ Engagement in Application of Interactive Instructional Strategies. Journal of Technology and Humanities, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.53797/jthkkss.v1i1.1.2020

Issue

Section

Articles