Problem Solving Skills based on IDEAL Model in Implementing Undergraduate Final Year Project

Authors

  • Nabila Muhammad Baba Gusau Faculty of Technical and Vocational Education, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, MALAYSIA
  • Mimi Mohaffyza Mohamad Faculty of Technical and Vocational Education, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53797/jthkkss.v1i1.4.2020

Keywords:

Problem-solving skills, Final year project (FYP), identify, define, explore

Abstract

Problem solving skills is the formal framework for undergraduate program in science and technical knowledge. This work aims to define the problem skills of the final year project (FYP) students. Most educators believe that problem solving is among the most important and practical kinds of learning and thought. One of the approach of problem solving skills introduced by Brandsford in IDEAL Model. This model consists five stages of problem solving; identify problem as opportunities, define the problems, develop and understanding goals, explore possible strategies, anticipate potential effects before apply and look back and learn. This research objectives are to develop research instrument based on IDEAL Model and identifying problem solving skills among students in conducting FYP. There are 324 students involved in this research from eight faculties in Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. The findings indicate that the reliability of the research instrument is sufficient to use and that the mean of identifying problem as opportunities in the IDEAL model showed higher score than other approaches. To sum up, problem-solving receives considerable attention in the undergraduate and helps students to improve their academic and problem-solving skills. Research on the development of problem-solving skills by students, the transfer of problem-solving skills to new contexts, and the effectiveness of particular pedagogical approaches to problem[1]solving teaching has provided a basis for academically accomplishments by students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, S.R.S., Anuar, N., Rosli, M.I., Kofli, N.T., & Rahman, N.A. (2013). Improvement in the Implementation of Undergraduate Research Project. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 141-147.

Bardach, E., & Patashnik, E.M. (2015). A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving: CQ press.

Bransford, J.D., Haynes, A.F., Stein, B.S., & Lin, X. (1998). The IDEAL Workplace: Strategies for Improving Learning, Problem Solving, and Creativity.

Bransford, J.D., & Stein, B.S. (1993). The IDEAL problem solver.

Boschetti, L., Stehman, S.V., & Roy, D.P. (2016). A stratified random sampling design in space and time for regional to global scale burned area product validation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 186, 465-478.

Frenseh, P.A., & Funke, J. (2014). Understanding Complex Problem Solving. Complex problem solving: The European perspective.

Hwang, G.-J., Hung, C.-M., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Improving learning achievements, motivations and problem-solving skills through a peer assessment-based game development approach. Educational technology research and development, 62(2), 129-145.

Jonassen, D.H. (2000a). Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centered learning environments. Theoretical foundations of learning environments, 89-121.

Jonassen, D.H. (2000b). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational technology research and development, 48(4), 63-85.

Jena, P.C. Cognitive Styles and Problem Solving Ability of Under Graduate Students. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research, 3(2), 71-16.

Jena, P.C. (2014). Cognitive Styles and Problem Solving Ability of Under Graduate Students. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research, 3(2), 71-16.

Kim, M.C., & Hannafin, M.J. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56(2), 403-417.

Lewis, S. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Health promotion practice, 16(4), 473-475.

Ko, M.M., Lee, M.S., Birch, S., & Lee, J.A. (2017). The Reliability and Validity of Instruments Measuring Pattern Identification in Korean Medicine: systematic review. European Journal of Integrative Medicine.

Mohamad, M.M., Sulaiman, N.L., Sern, L.C., & Salleh, K.M. (2015). Measuring the validity and reliability of research instruments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 164-171.

Taherdoost, Hamed. (2016). Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management. 5. 28-36. 10.2139/ssrn.3205040.

Wyss, R. (2002). Field independent/dependent learning styles and L2 acquisition. The weekly column. Article, 102.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-28

How to Cite

Muhammad Baba Gusau, N. ., & Mohamad, M. M. . (2020). Problem Solving Skills based on IDEAL Model in Implementing Undergraduate Final Year Project. Journal of Technology and Humanities, 1(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.53797/jthkkss.v1i1.4.2020