Online Learning Preparation of College Students in Higher Vocational Education

Authors

  • Ka Chen Zhumadian Vocational and Technical College, Zhumadian, 463000, CHINA
  • Zhao Zhang Zhumadian Vocational and Technical College, Zhumadian, 463000, CHINA
  • Hui Jia Zhumadian Vocational and Technical College, Zhumadian, 463000, CHINA
  • Ju Lei Li Zhumadian Vocational and Technical College, Zhumadian, 463000, CHINA
  • Ming Han Zhang Zhumadian Vocational and Technical College, Zhumadian, 463000, CHINA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53797/jthkkss.v3i1.5.2022

Keywords:

Blended teaching preparation, Teacher preparation, Student preparation, University teaching reform, Research study

Abstract

Information technology has led to changes in traditional teaching concepts and approaches. In order to meet the new generation's pursuit of new learning forms, university teaching reform is imminent, and blended teaching, which combines the advantages of traditional teaching and online teaching, has undoubtedly become the first choice for university teaching reform in the era of technological innovation. In the face of rapid reform, how to cope with it is the primary issue for teachers and students in universities to consider. This study adopts research methods such as the questionnaire survey method and literature research method to investigate the readiness of teachers and students to promote blended teaching reform in a university in Shanxi Province. Firstly, the relevant literature of the last ten years was combed and analyzed to shed light on the research ideas of blended teaching readiness, and then it was decided to measure the readiness of teachers and students through questionnaires, teacher-student interviews, and classroom observations. In the early stages of the research practice, some teachers and students were interviewed to understand the educational background of the study participants, and a questionnaire was developed to investigate the readiness of teachers and students for blended teaching, which was divided into two parts: a teacher questionnaire and a student questionnaire. At the same time, we went into the teaching classroom to examine the real teaching situation in the field and record the real responses of teachers and students in the classroom. Next, the data obtained from the questionnaires, interviews, and observations were collected, collated, and analyzed in detail. Finally, the findings of this study are discussed in the context of the questionnaire, interview and observation results, and research implications are drawn. The study found that teachers were competent and relatively well prepared for the requirements of blended learning, but the actual implementation was less optimistic due to practical factors such as the difficulty of the subject, lack of time, and technical difficulties, and some teachers continued to teach using traditional lecture methods. Students generally lack self-awareness and have poor study management and self-discipline. First-year students were significantly more competent in all areas and more motivated to learn than students in other years. Reflections and analysis of the study findings yielded some insights, (1) Explore appropriate teaching styles based on the nature of the subject; (2) Concentrating on teachers' and students' lack of time; (3) Providing technical assistance; (4) Determining appropriate teaching styles for students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chang W. (2020). A Survey on the Preparation of Teachers and students in Colleges and Universities to Promote the Blended Teaching Reform. Shanxi Normal University, 5, 92.

Czerniewicz, L., Agherdien, N., Badenhorst, J., Belluigi, D., Chambers, T., Chili, M., & Wissing, G. (2020). A wake-up call: Equity, inequality and Covid-19 emergency remote teaching and learning. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 946-967.

Edumadze, J., Ogoe, J. I., Essilfie, G., Edumadze, G. E., Osei-Gyasi, A. A., & Graham, R. E. (2017). E-learning at the university of Cape Coast, Ghana-are our distance education students technologically ready?

Gao, Y., Hendricks, L. A., Kuchenbecker, K. J., & Darrell, T. (2016, May). Deep learning for tactile understanding from visual and haptic data. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 536-543). IEEE.

Garrison, D, R, Anderson T, Archer W. (2001). Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education. American Journal of distance Education, 1,7-23.

Graham, A., & Pasi, S. (2020). Schools are moving online, but not all children start out digitally equal. 1-8.

Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080-1090.

King, S. E., & Cerrone Arnold, K. A. T. I. E. (2012). Blended learning environments in higher education: A case study of how professors make it happen. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 25.

Korr, J., Derwin, E. B., Greene, K., & Sokoloff, W. (2012). Transitioning an adult-serving university to a blended learning model. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 60(1), 2-11.

Liao, S. H., Chen, C. C., Hu, D. C., Chung, Y. C., & Yang, M. J. (2017). Developing a sustainable competitive advantage: absorptive capacity, knowledge transfer and organizational learning. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(6), 1431-1450.

Li, Q., Li, Z., & Han, J. (2021). A hybrid learning pedagogy for surmounting the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in the performing arts education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7635-7655.

Powell, A., Kennedy, K., & Rabbitt, B. (2014). Blended learning teacher competency framework. Vienna: iNA-COL.

Pratama, H., Azman, M. N. A., Kassymova, G. K., & Duisenbayeva, S. S. (2020). The Trend in using online meeting applications for learning during the period of pandemic COVID-19: A literature review. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(2), 58-68.

Ren, M., Ma, Y., Fan, W., Li, M., & Feng, Y. (2022). An Empirical Study on the Behavioral Intention of College Students’ Online Ideological and Political Learning. International Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting, 2022.

Sha, J, Guan Z, & Li W. (2015). An empirical study on the influence of teacher support strategies on college students' learning engagement in blended Teaching. China Electronic Education, 2, 21-28.

Tu, Y., & Ibrahim, A. (2022). Research on the Management of International students in Chinese Colleges and Universities. ICCCM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v1i3.6.2022

Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in education, 38(2), 213-230.

Xiaoying, F., Ruixue, W., & Yijun, W. (2018). A Review of blended Teaching Research at Home and abroad--An Analytical Framework based on Blended Teaching [J]. Journal of distance education, 36(3), 13-24.

Yu, Y. (2018, July). Towards Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning. In IJCAI (pp. 5739-5743).

Yang, Z., & Sheikh Khairuddin, S. M. H. (2022). The Pressing Needs of Human Resource Management Renovation of Higher Vocational Schools in China: From the Perspective of Teacher Competency. ICCCM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v1i3.3.2022

Yang, Y., & Hospedales, T. M. (2014). A unified perspective on multi-domain and multi-task learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.7489.

Yeh, Y. C., Kwok, O. M., Chien, H. Y., Sweany, N. W., Baek, E., & McIntosh, W. A. (2019). How College Students' Achievement Goal Orientations Predict Their Expected Online Learning Outcome: The Mediation Roles of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and Supportive Online Learning Behaviors. Online Learning, 23(4), 23-41.

Yilin, M. (2022). Research on intervention strategies to improve online participation of MOOC learners. Northeast Normal University, 3, 70.

Wang, Y., Han, X., & Yang, J. (2015). Revisiting the blended learning literature: Using a complex adaptive systems framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 380-393.

Wang, J., Nie, X., Xia, Y., Wu, Y., & Zhu, S. C. (2014). Cross-view action modeling, learning and recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 2649-2656).

Zhao, P., Hoi, S. C., Wang, J., & Li, B. (2014). Online transfer learning. Artificial intelligence, 216, 76-102.

Zhijia, M. (2017). Research on Structural Relationship and Effects of Influential Factors of MOOCs Learning Participation: From Perspective of Self-determination Theory. e-Education Research, 10(294), 37-42.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-28

How to Cite

Chen, K., Zhang, Z., Jia, H., Li, J. L., & Zhang, M. H. (2022). Online Learning Preparation of College Students in Higher Vocational Education. Journal of Technology and Humanities, 3(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.53797/jthkkss.v3i1.5.2022