Evaluation Models in Curriculum and Educational Program - A Document Analysis Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53797/jthkkss.v5i1.4.2024Keywords:
Evaluation models, Curriculum evaluation, Educational program evaluation, Document analysisAbstract
An educational or instructional program's efficacy may be impacted by the curriculum, which is a significant factor. The issue of evaluating curriculum and instruction has been of concern to researchers at every time and every place. As research progresses, various evaluation models have emerged and are being revised and refined. The purpose of this research is to review some of the best-known models for evaluating curriculum instruction. During this process, researchers used document analysis methods to select relevant research documents based on predetermined criteria. These documents included articles and books. These models are then discussed. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of some models are shown. It is concluded that the appropriate models or the necessary combinations need to be selected according to the actual requirements of the project. Finally, the researchers explore an evaluation model based on previous research to evaluate student curriculum learning outcomes.
Downloads
References
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Brinkerhoff, R. O. (2003). The Success Case Method: Find Out Quickly What’s Working and What’s Not. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Brinkerhoff, R. O. (2005). The Success Case Method: A Strategic Evaluation Approach to Increasing the Value and Effect of Training. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(1), 86-101.
Cahapay, M. (2021). Kirkpatrick Model: Its Limitations as Used in Higher Education Evaluation. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(1), 135-144.
Cai, Q. H. (2003). Focus on Curriculum Evaluation and Promote Curriculum Construction. Journal of Shaoyang University (Social Science Edition), 2(03), 135-137.
Drakos, J. (2005). Ideas for developing a personal EFL teaching curriculum. The Internet TESL Journal, XI (3), 1-3.
Hamemoradi, M., Khorasani, A., & FathiAjargah, K. (2014). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the on-the-job Training Courses in NIGC Based Kirkpatrick, Phillips and CIPP Models. Strategic Studies in Petroleum and energy Industry, 5(19), 103-130.
Kavgaoglu, D., & Alci, B. (2016). Application of Context Input Process and Product Model in Curriculum Evaluation: Case Study of a Call Centre. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(17), 1659-1669.
Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. 3rd ed. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Liu, X. Y., Wang, Z. B., & Wang, Z. Y. (2016). Research on upgrade path of vocational schools' personnel training quality under connotative development perspective. Journal of Luohe Vocational Technology College, 15(03), 17-19.
Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' Evaluations of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues, and Directions for Future Research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 253-388.
McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford University Press.
Medgyes, P., & Nikolov, M. (2010). Curriculum development in foreign language education: The interface between political and professional decisions. in B. Kaplan, R. (2nd Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics. PP.263-274.
Nouraey, P., Al-Badi, A., Riasati, M. J., & Maata, R. L. (2020). Educational Program and Curriculum Evaluation Models: A Mini Systematic Review of the Recent Trends. Universal J Educ Res, 8(9), 4048-4055.
O’Leary, Z. (2014). The essential guide to doing your research project. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Phillips, J. J. (2012). Return on investment in training and performance improvement programs. Routledge.
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Henry, G. T. (2019). Evaluation: A systematic approach. 8th ed. Sage Publications.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In Kellaghan, T., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (Eds.) International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 31-62.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Shu Liu, Yanbin Zu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
